Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz are pushing what many consider the most extreme pro-abortion agenda in U.S. history. Their platform champions unrestricted access to abortion, supporting feticide at all stages of pregnancy without apology or limitation. Harris and Walz emphasize a woman’s right to choose, disregarding the foundational belief that life begins at conception, a view held by many Americans who argue that every unborn life is sacred and should be protected from the moment of conception.
Central to the pro-life position is the understanding that life begins at conception. This belief is rooted in both science and moral conviction, as the fertilized egg possesses a unique DNA code, distinct from both parents, signifying the start of a new human life. Many pro-life advocates maintain that every unborn child, regardless of the stage of development, has an inherent right to life and must be afforded the same protection as any other person.
For decades, the debate over abortion has revolved around this fundamental question of when life begins. Proponents of the sanctity of life argue that from the moment of conception, the unborn child is a living being with intrinsic value, deserving of dignity and protection. This view is shared by millions of Americans who see the pro-abortion stance of Harris and Walz as an affront to the rights of the unborn.
Harris and Walz’s platform represents a stark departure from any form of abortion restrictions, advocating for procedures up until the moment of birth. This stance includes support for late-term abortions, which are particularly controversial given the development of the unborn child during the later stages of pregnancy. By advocating for policies that enable the termination of life at any stage, Harris and Walz have aligned themselves with the most extreme pro-abortion advocates, raising serious ethical and moral questions.
Late-term abortions, especially when performed after the point of viability, are viewed by many as particularly egregious, as medical advancements have shown that babies born prematurely can survive outside the womb as early as 22 weeks. The push for unrestricted access disregards this reality and intensifies the moral and ethical concerns of those who believe in the sanctity of life.
Harris and Walz’s campaign rhetoric around abortion leaves little room for the pro-life perspective, which is deeply rooted in both faith and reason. For countless Americans, abortion is not just a political issue; it is a matter of life and death. The belief that every human life, no matter how small or vulnerable, is valuable and worthy of protection is a cornerstone of the pro-life movement. By advocating for policies that allow for the destruction of life at any stage of pregnancy, Harris and Walz dismiss the deeply held convictions of pro-life Americans.
This extreme pro-abortion platform also disregards the growing number of people who view abortion not only as a moral issue but as a human rights violation. As awareness of the humanity of the unborn grows, particularly through advances in prenatal imaging and fetal development research, more Americans are questioning the ethics of unrestricted abortion access. Yet, the Harris-Walz platform appears impervious to these concerns, instead doubling down on their commitment to “reproductive rights” without considering the rights of the unborn.
The pro-life movement holds that every human being, from the moment of conception, is created in the image of God and possesses inherent dignity and worth. This view is not only a religious belief but also a reflection of natural law, which recognizes the intrinsic value of every human life. Harris and Walz’s platform, which promotes the destruction of life at all stages of pregnancy, stands in direct opposition to this belief and calls into question their commitment to protecting the most vulnerable among us.
The belief in the sanctity of life is shared by millions of Americans who understand that abortion, particularly in its most extreme forms, is a violation of human rights. While Harris and Walz champion their pro-abortion platform under the banner of women’s rights, pro-life advocates argue that true equality and justice can only be achieved when the rights of the unborn are respected and protected.
Kamala Harris and Tim Walz’s extreme pro-abortion platform represents a stark contrast to the values of millions of Americans who believe in the sanctity of life. By advocating for unrestricted access to abortion, including late-term procedures, Harris and Walz have positioned themselves at odds with the growing number of people who recognize that life begins at conception and that every unborn child deserves protection.
As the debate over abortion continues to intensify, it is clear that Harris and Walz’s platform is not simply about “choice” but about the devaluation of life itself. For those who believe that life is sacred from the moment of conception, the Harris-Walz campaign serves as a reminder of the urgent need to defend the unborn and protect the most vulnerable members of society from the extreme and dangerous policies being championed in the name of reproductive rights.
Darnell Thompkins 
Kevin Parker